{"id":1615723866,"date":"2026-06-03T21:19:05","date_gmt":"2026-06-03T21:19:05","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.gapasinlaw.com\/what-is-unlawful-command-influence-why-should-i-care-if-it-happens-in-my-court-martial"},"modified":"2026-06-03T21:19:05","modified_gmt":"2026-06-03T21:19:05","slug":"what-is-unlawful-command-influence-why-should-i-care-if-it-happens-in-my-court-martial","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/gapasinlaw.espresso.themodernfirm.com\/?p=1615723866","title":{"rendered":"What Is Unlawful Command Influence?  Why Should I Care If It Happens In My Court-Martial?"},"content":{"rendered":"<h1><a href=\"https:\/\/gapasinlaw.espresso.themodernfirm.com\/what-is-unlawful-command-influence-why-should-i-care-if-it-happens-in-my-court-martial\">What Is Unlawful Command Influence?  Why Should I Care If It Happens In My Court-Martial?<\/a><\/h1>\n<p class=\"meta\">Posted by <a href=\"https:\/\/gapasinlaw.espresso.themodernfirm.com\/our-attorneys\/ernesto-g-gapasin\">Ernesto Gapasin<\/a> | <span class=\"dateIco\">Oct 23, 2023<\/span> | <span class=\"commentsIco\">0 Comments<\/span><\/p>\n<div class=\"entry\">\n<div class=\"wysiwyg_container\">\n<p>One of the main functions of a defense counsel in military courts is to do everything possible to prevent Unlawful Command Influence, otherwise known simply as &#8220;UCI&#8221;. &nbsp;Unlawful command influence occurs when a superior substitutes their judgment for that of a subordinate thereby precluding the subordinate from exercising their own independent judgment. &nbsp;In the military justice system, this is unlawful and impermissible. &nbsp;Additionally, exerting influence on witnesses (or even potential witnesses) on how they testify, or discouraging witnesses from testifying also threatens the fundamental right to a fair trial, the right to compulsory process, the right to cross-examine and confront witnesses, and the right to the assistance of counsel. &nbsp;It also potentially violates Article 46, UCMJ, which assures the defense equal access to evidence. &nbsp;<em>See United States v. Gleason, 43 M.J. 69 (1995)<\/em> (finding UCI in case where a battalion commander made clear to members of the battalion that: [1] he believed the suspect to be guilty, [2] that the suspect&#8217;s military defense counsel was the \u201cenemy,\u201d and [3] that testimony should not be offered on behalf of the accused).&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Undue command influence occurs, among other times, when a person subject to the Uniform Code of Military Justice attempts to coerce or, by any unauthorized means, influence the action of any court-martial, any other military tribunal, or any member, in reaching the findings or sentence in a case, or the action of any convening, approving, or reviewing authority with respect to judicial acts <em>(R.C.M. 104).&nbsp;<\/em><\/p>\n<p>If unlawful command influence is found by the Military Judge, and if the government fails to satisfy its burden that it did not occur or impact the proceedings, then <strong><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">dismissal of charges<\/span><\/strong> is a justifiable course of action. &nbsp;Article 37, UCMJ, <strong><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">prohibits commanders, and others, from unlawfully influencing the action of a court-martial,<\/span><\/strong> and Article 98 makes punishable the failure to promptly dispose of charges or to enforce any other provision in the UCMJ. &nbsp;<br \/>&nbsp;<br \/>What follows is important: &nbsp;\u201c[O]nce unlawful command influence is raised at the trial level&#8230; a presumption of prejudice is created.\u201d &nbsp;<em>United States v. Douglas, <\/em>68 M.J. 349, 354 (C.A.A.F., 2009). &nbsp;A military judge \u201cmay consider dismissal when necessary to avoid prejudice against the accused. &nbsp;Dismissal of charges is appropriate when an accused would be prejudiced or no useful purpose would be served by continuing the proceedings.\u201d <em>&nbsp;Id.<\/em> at 354-55 (citations omitted). &nbsp;In <em>Douglas,<\/em> the court found that no-contact orders and negative behavior of the accused&#8217;s military supervisor discouraged witnesses from providing character statements for the accused and resulted in unlawful command influence. &nbsp;<em>Id., <\/em>at 352. &nbsp;&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>The Government also, for example, cannot take deliberate action to influence an Article 32 Preliminary Hearing Officer as well as the procedures in this case. &nbsp;An &#8220;Article 32 investigation is a judicial proceeding.&#8221; <em>United States v. Bell,<\/em> 44 M.J. 403, 406 (1996). Ex parte communications between an Article 32 investigating officer and a member of the prosecution are improper. &nbsp;<em>United States v. Payne, <\/em>3 M.J. 354 (CMA 1977).<\/p>\n<p>A defendant who is being denied the fair administration of justice and is clearly affected by the Government&#8217;s influence of witnesses or the procedures needs a defense counsel ready to call this out. &nbsp;If you believe you are the victim of &#8220;UCI&#8221;, fill out the <a id=\"insertion_487765\" data-insertion-id=\"487765\" class=\"insertion link\" target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/gapasinlaw.espresso.themodernfirm.com\/contact-us\">&#8220;Contact Us&#8221;<\/a> form and speak with a civilian counsel today.<br \/>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>What Is Unlawful Command Influence? Why Should I Care If It Happens In My Court-Martial? Posted by Ernesto Gapasin | Oct 23, 2023 | 0 Comments One of the main functions of a defense counsel in military courts is to do everything possible to prevent Unlawful Command Influence, otherwise known simply<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1615723866","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/gapasinlaw.espresso.themodernfirm.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1615723866","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/gapasinlaw.espresso.themodernfirm.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/gapasinlaw.espresso.themodernfirm.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gapasinlaw.espresso.themodernfirm.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gapasinlaw.espresso.themodernfirm.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1615723866"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/gapasinlaw.espresso.themodernfirm.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1615723866\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/gapasinlaw.espresso.themodernfirm.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1615723866"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gapasinlaw.espresso.themodernfirm.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1615723866"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gapasinlaw.espresso.themodernfirm.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1615723866"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}